Deborah Tannens Cant We Talk Essay examples -- Deborah Tannen Cant

Deborah Tannen's Can't We Talk Deborah Tannen’s case study entitled â€Å"Can’t We Talk?† is the most relevant reading that I have ever done for any class. It relates to a problem that every person regardless of age, race or sex, will have to face many times in his or her lifetime. The problem is that men and women communicate differently and these differences can often lead to conflict. This case study is very informative because it helps to clarify the thought process of each sex. That said this reading leaves the reader somewhat unfulfilled because Tannen does not offer a solution to the problem. In Tannen’s first section, status vs. support, Tannen states that women view talking as a way to receive support, whereas men are always trying to gain the upper hand while talking. Tannen and her husband had jobs in different cities. When people would comment on her situation Tannen would accept their support of her difficult situation. Her husband, on the other hand, would feel threatened and felt compelled to refuse their support and point out the good in the situation. Due to societal influences men are often expected to be tough and therefore they feel threatened more easily. Because they feel threatened more easily they tend to go on the offensive more during conversation. Women are expected to be more sensitive and therefore they seek support. The section entitled advice vs. understanding is very closely related to status vs. support. In this section a woman has a deformed breast, due to a previous bout with cancer, and expresses her distress to her husband. H er husband responds that she could have plastic surgery to correct the deformity. She became quite upset at the thought of another surgery. Because of t... ...roblems of inter sex communication. She does a superb job of pointing out how each sex reacts to each situation and why, but does not even propose a solution. Now that I have read this case study I feel as though I am prepared to offer a solution although I am not sure how viable it is. The recurring themes of Tannen’s case study are that men are expected to be tough and women are expected to seek support. These themes seem to be the root of the conflict between the sexes, so I would propose that each sex should do their best to break away from these expectations. Men should strive to be more open and less concerned about preserving a macho image whereas women should strive to be less dependent on the approval of others. While my proposed solution would not completely abolish miscommunication between the sexes, it would be a large step in the right direction.

Is Climate Change Man Made Environmental Sciences Essay

Bushnell ( 2010 ) states that Carbon dioxide degrees are now greater than at any clip in the past 650,000 old ages and mean planetary temperature is keeping its lifting tendency. Similarly, Human activities has released plenty C to raise the temperature of the Earth about 1 grade over the last century ( Alterman, 2006 ) . Our planet is sing a clime alteration headed by temperature additions. Climate alteration is going a serious job all over the universe. It is genuinely a planetary issue that impacts on all persons irrespective of nationality, gender or wealth. In recent old ages, human often take the effects for clime alteration with blood and cryings. DeWeerdt ( 2007 ) believes that the duty for 150,000 extra deceases annually due to utmost conditionss was climate alteration. Climate alteration, as a worldwide job, bit by bit poses a menace to life of human Begins. Glacial extirpation, sea degree rise, reduced harvests, extreme conditions, species extinctionaˆÂ ¦ It is human being that should be blamed non the nature because clime alteration is semisynthetic. This essay is to explicate that planetary clime is warming and this alteration is caused by human activities which are emanations from fossil fuel burning, inordinate land usage and population growing. Any alteration in the conditions forms of an country which is long-run and important particularly warming is climate alteration ( Dictionary.com, 2011 ) . The most of import ground of clime alteration is firing of fossil fuel. As all known that burning of coal and gasolene can bring forth C dioxide and other nursery gas. Excessive measure of nursery gas will barricade the heat exchange between the Earth and ambiance, which bit by bit consequences in planetary heating. Although people realized this a long clip ago, the demand of coal has ne'er decreased. â€Å" Today, coal-burning power mills generate the bulk of electricity in the United States ( 48 per centum ) , followed by natural gas ( 22 per centum ) , atomic ( 19 per centum ) and renewables ( 9 per centum ) † ( Kliesch, 2011 ) . For illustration, China, the biggest manufacturer of coal in the universe which generates more than 70 % of its electricity with coal has turned to foreigner providers because domestic supply can non fulfill immense demand ( Anonymous, 2011 ) . Besides, gasolene for autos is another subscriber to planetary heating. As electricity autos will go on m eet challenges, the huge bulk autos daily used by people consume gasolene. One typical auto emits 11,740 lbs of C dioxide per twelvemonth, nevertheless the bad intelligence is carbon dioxide can non be minimized through the emission-control system in autos ( Kliesch, 2011 ) . In decision, human productive activities rely on dodo fuel, limitless burning regardless of its consequence on planetary clime eventually result in a heating clime. Littorals ( 2009 ) suggests that manage of land usage is besides required to restrict emanation of C dioxide every bit good as burning of fossil fuel. Excessive land usage is the other ground of clime alteration. It is by and large known that oceans and workss take CO2 from atmosphere. As explained by Hoogeveen ( 2007 ) , oceans absorb CO2 since it is soluble in H2O ; workss and trees remove CO2 due to photosynthesis and carry it in signifier of energy- a procedure named as â€Å" C segregation † . To be more precise, 60 % of CO2 emitted by human activities is absorbed by oceans and workss. However world is interrupting the C rhythm, the delicate balanced system what C exchanged through land, H2O and air ( Alterman, 2006 ) . Emission of C dioxide is increasing while land area of woods is cut downing. There is increasing grounds that woods are under force per unit area ( Hoogeveen, 2007 ) . Thousands of square kilometers of woods disappears and so go paper merely to fulfill lim itless human wants. Rivers can non last as more land for skyscraper is needed. Hoogeveen ( 2007 ) states that as a consequence of deforestation and fire, devastation of woods adds one million millions of metric tons of C into atmosphere every twelvemonth. Thus, inordinate land usage has impacts on planetary clime alteration. Population growing is the 3rd ground of clime alteration. Rapid population growing leads to higher ingestion of natural resources and pollutant emanation. With increasing consciousness on planetary heating and its chief perpetrator, C dioxide emanations, population growing is deriving attending of climatologists. Petroleum, one of the beginnings used for generates electricity, gives off a batch of pollution. Watching Television, utilizing air-condition, play picture gamesaˆÂ ¦when people do these things more nursery gas is sent to the air. Froome ( 2010 ) believes that as seeking to run into both domestic and international emanation decrease, the electricity sector is the most critical beginning of nursery gas emanation in Australia. Since population additions quickly, more electricity is demanded. That is to state, there is more C dioxide emitted into the air to fulfill increasing electricity demand due to population growing. Besides, more refuse is sent to landfills because of increasing population. The procedure of firing refuse sends an tremendous sum of nursery gas and makes planetary warming worse. Wolpin ( 2006 ) states that the entire sum of waste generated have been lifting greatly as a consequence of increasing population. In drumhead, population growing should be considered as a of import cause. However, there are still some natural component may ensue in clime alteration such as home base tectonics, solar end product, orbital fluctuations, volcanism and ocean variableness. But this can non be alibis of world. It is human being should be responsible for planetary clime alteration. Global clime alteration which has caused a batch of catastrophes on the Earth is semisynthetic. Emissions from fossil fuel burning, inordinate land usage and population growing are the major factors can ensue in clime alteration. Finally the universe gathered in Copenhagen to discourse how much C dioxide people should be seting into the ambiance. Time is running out, human should move from right now. developing environmental direction engineerings, utilizing clean energy and puting up comparative Torahs are all executable ways to stabilise clime alteration.

Kitzmiller v. Dover Intelligent Design in Schools

The 2005  case of Kitzmiller v. Dover brought before the court the question of teaching Intelligent Design in schools. This was the first time in America that any schools at any level  had specifically promoted Intelligent Design. It would become an important test for the constitutionality of teaching Intelligent Design in public schools. What Lead to Kitzmiller v. Dover? The Dover Area School Board of York County, Pennsylvania made their  decision on October 18, 2004. They voted that students in the schools should be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwins theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. On November 19, 2004, the board announced that teachers would be required to read this disclaimer to 9th-grade biology classes. On December 14, 2004, a group of parents filed suit against the board. They argued that the promotion of Intelligent Design is an unconstitutional promotion of religion, violating the separation of church and state. The trial in federal district court before Judge Jones began on September 26, 2005. It ended on November 4, 2005. The Decision of  Kitzmiller v. Dover In a broad, detailed, and at times withering decision, Judge John E. Jones III handed opponents of religion in schools a substantial victory. He concluded that Intelligent Design as introduced into the Dover schools was simply the newest format of creationism used by religious opponents of evolution. Therefore, according to the Constitution, it could not be taught in the public schools. Jones decision is considerably lengthy and worth reading. It can be found and is the topic of frequent discussion on the  National Center for Science Education (NCSE) website. To come to his decision, Jones took into account many factors. These included Intelligent Design textbooks, history of religious opposition to evolution, and the intent of the Dover School Board. Jones also considered The Pennsylvania Academic Standards which required students to learn about Darwins Theory of Evolution. During the trial, supporters of Intelligent Design were given an opportunity to make the best case possible against their critics. They were questioned by a sympathetic lawyer who allowed them to make their arguments as they thought best. They then had the opportunity to offer their explanations to the questions of a critical lawyer. Leading defenders of Intelligent Design spent days on the witness stand. They put Intelligent Design in the best light possible in the context of a neutral fact-finding investigation. They wanted for nothing, except facts and sound arguments it seems. Judge Jones concludes his detailed decision: In summary, the disclaimer singles out the theory of evolution for special treatment, misrepresents its status in the scientific community, causes students to doubt its validity without scientific justification, presents students with a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory, directs them to consult a creationist text as though it were a science resource, and instructs students to forego scientific inquiry in the public school classroom and instead to seek out religious instruction elsewhere. Where This Left Intelligent Design   What little success the Intelligent Design movement has enjoyed in America has been due entirely to political spin and positive public relations. When it comes to science and law—two areas where facts and arguments count for everything while posturing is treated as a weakness—Intelligent Design fails. As a consequence of Kitzmiller v. Dover, we have a definitive explanation from a conservative Christian judge about why Intelligent Design is religious rather than scientific.